What is an Open Aura?
2 weeks ago
Friday, August 30, 2013
Radioactivity from Fukushima - What to Do?
The Fukushima desaster shows once gain that we have to use our own brain to come to conclusions and to take action. In my opinion the public will in such a case never be informed properly because of the concern they might become to fearful.
After the Fikushima desaster I wanted to buy liquid ptassium iodine in a drugstore and I could not get it and was ridiculed by the pharmacist.
I started to take Kelp because it contains iodine, which will be soon a NONO because in a radioactive Pacific the Kelp will be radioactive too ... as the fish.
On this site
http://www.naturalnews.com/041800_Fukushima_radiation_leaks_desperation.html
one can read the following sentence
" ... the Japanese government .... attempted to convince people that if they drank beer or smiled, they would be immune to radiation poisoning. (Yes, this is how desperate they've become...)"
The author of the article obviously did not understand why the Japanese government was saying this ... it all has to do with the fact that the only solution for this problem is a vibrational one. We have to raise our consciousness. A high consciousness results in a higher vibratory level of the cells and then damaging things just pass through us.
somewhere I read the Russans were actually grateful for Chernobyl because it showed them it is possible to overcome the radiation danger. This is probably where the Japanese got ther idea from.
This is one of the reasons I am practicing Reconnective Healing® and The Reconnection®... Just think of EMF.
Anybody who is anxious nd fearful will only get drunk with beer.
When we are calm, centered, and at peace through Reconnective Healing® then beer might help also ... but to be honest ... I believe that it would not be necessary.
Wise owl Anna
www.ReconnectionToTheCosmos.com
www.energy-all-around.com
Sunday, August 18, 2013
What is a Portable and Cordless Phone?
A phone that one puts on a base which is connected with a landline is NON a landline phone ....IT IS NOT!
Every phone that you carry around in the house and garden and you put on the base to re-charge is a Portable Phone.
These Portable Phones are emitting more EMR (electro-magnetic radiation) than cell phones.
When one speaks longer than eight minutes on a cell phone or a Portable Phone the bloodbrain barrier is interrupted and all the toxins from the blood get into the brain! Both phones - cell phones and portable phones should NEVER be in your bedroom. NEVER!!!
Anna Christine
www.energy-all-around.com
www.ReconnectionToTheCosmos.com
Every phone that you carry around in the house and garden and you put on the base to re-charge is a Portable Phone.
These Portable Phones are emitting more EMR (electro-magnetic radiation) than cell phones.
When one speaks longer than eight minutes on a cell phone or a Portable Phone the bloodbrain barrier is interrupted and all the toxins from the blood get into the brain! Both phones - cell phones and portable phones should NEVER be in your bedroom. NEVER!!!
Anna Christine
www.energy-all-around.com
www.ReconnectionToTheCosmos.com
Should vaccination be mandatory for children?
This is in regard to the idea that vaccination of children should be mandatory. A healthprofessional from New Yorck spoke recently about this issue in regard to measles. He was of course for vaccination.
In my opinion either he or I am not able to think logically.
Let's say there are 100 children and 60 parents decide to vaccinate their child against measles. 40 do not want any vaccination.
Which means when there is a measle breakout then
60 children will be safe and the parents don't have to worry their child might become sick and
40 children are not vaccinated and some might get sick because it was their parents decision that the children do NOT get vaccinated. These parents, knowing about the potential danger of vaccination, decided against vaccination.
Beside the ingredients in the vaccination like aluminum and mercury one also never knows whether germs are already in the childs' body and the immune system needs all its strength to fight them. The additional germs from the vaccination could be too much and put the life of the child at risk.
I doubt that these 40 parents would sue anybody when their child becomes sick because it was their decision that their child did not get vaccinated. They wanted their child to develop a healthy immune system. Sometimes they even don't mind the child gets sick because that strengthens the immune system too.
The term 'herd immunity' really does not make any sense.
The vaccinated children are supposed to stay healthy and the parents of the unvaccinated children would never sue anybody.
Or is there a risk that a child still gets the measles despite being vaccinated? When that is the case the vaccination doesn't make any sense either, at least in my opinion.
Then the only one that might sue anybody would be the parents of the child that got harmed by the vaccination -and I don't know whom they would sue ... the doctor, tha producer of the vaccination, or the one who ordered the vaccination to be mandatory.
Actually I have heard from 3 health professionals (doctors), each one with 6 children, whose children were NOT vaccinated.
Dr. Mercola attended one or two years ago a conference about vaccination and told in one of his newsletters later he had been crying when he learned about the dangers of vaccination; realising what he had done to all the children he had vaccinated. It is time that people start to analyse given information critically.
Anna Christine
www.energy-all-around.com www.ReconnectionToTheCosmos.com
In my opinion either he or I am not able to think logically.
Let's say there are 100 children and 60 parents decide to vaccinate their child against measles. 40 do not want any vaccination.
Which means when there is a measle breakout then
60 children will be safe and the parents don't have to worry their child might become sick and
40 children are not vaccinated and some might get sick because it was their parents decision that the children do NOT get vaccinated. These parents, knowing about the potential danger of vaccination, decided against vaccination.
Beside the ingredients in the vaccination like aluminum and mercury one also never knows whether germs are already in the childs' body and the immune system needs all its strength to fight them. The additional germs from the vaccination could be too much and put the life of the child at risk.
I doubt that these 40 parents would sue anybody when their child becomes sick because it was their decision that their child did not get vaccinated. They wanted their child to develop a healthy immune system. Sometimes they even don't mind the child gets sick because that strengthens the immune system too.
The term 'herd immunity' really does not make any sense.
The vaccinated children are supposed to stay healthy and the parents of the unvaccinated children would never sue anybody.
Or is there a risk that a child still gets the measles despite being vaccinated? When that is the case the vaccination doesn't make any sense either, at least in my opinion.
Then the only one that might sue anybody would be the parents of the child that got harmed by the vaccination -and I don't know whom they would sue ... the doctor, tha producer of the vaccination, or the one who ordered the vaccination to be mandatory.
Actually I have heard from 3 health professionals (doctors), each one with 6 children, whose children were NOT vaccinated.
Dr. Mercola attended one or two years ago a conference about vaccination and told in one of his newsletters later he had been crying when he learned about the dangers of vaccination; realising what he had done to all the children he had vaccinated. It is time that people start to analyse given information critically.
Anna Christine
www.energy-all-around.com www.ReconnectionToTheCosmos.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
